I have to admit, I was a bit disappointed by a lot of the content in this course. It was very opinion based and a review of subjective interviews, with more philosophical stances and very few based on presented facts. Also references to technological limitations were made which were simply not true which made me question the expertise. The content was definitely dated. Conceptually, I think the topics covered were interesting and the idea of Energy Security was very interesting to consider.

The first part of the MOOC gives interesting and qualitative explanations to the topic. Interviews are always pleasant to listen to and the readings, sometimes a bit long and complicated, still provide precious information for those who want to go further in the develompment of each topic.

But the second part on (courses 4 and 5) lack of content with outdated and unavailable reading contents. It is disappointing regarding the quality of the first part.

A very interesting topic. However, the course was let down somewhat by two problems. First, some of the key readings were not accessible, either being behind paywalls or no longer being available using the links provided. And second, some of the readings and content felt a little out of date, particularly in a context that continues to change in real time.

The course gives a good overview of global energy and climate policy, but many of the articles for reading are from several years ago. The Climate sector is advancing rapidly, and I would argue that some of the articles for reading are out of date if they are from 4 or 5 years ago. Other than that, the course was a good high level overview.

The course material is very limited and eurocentric. System should take care that assignment are properly circulated for peer review and system should make them available when due. Overall a superficial course.

Too much panel discussion session, though the content from the panelist were good. This is a Course, not a collection of panel discussion. There were insufficient slides for the content of this course.

I would have really enjoyed reading a compendium for the course. Or, at least, it would have been helpful if each week, there was a summary of what we should have learned from the readings and videos.

Outdated Material

The course material and reading material are 7-8 years old. The concepts still make sense, but the concepts have themselves moved on. The course was enjoyable and well prepared, but should have been significantly updated.

Creating video lectures without fixed text is poor preparation. Unfortunately, information was not adequate during conversations.

The topics of the course are relevant however the information and readings are already 10 years out of date and some are inaccessible.

not aa good