Learner Reviews & Feedback for Reading and Comprehension of Text in English by Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana
About the Course
Top reviews
JK
Aug 23, 2024
Super cours, je n'ai pas encore reçu le certificat.
LS
Mar 16, 2025
Muito obrigado aos idealizadores do curso. Excelente didática. Obs: Há um erro no módulo 3, é necessário corrigir!
26 - 39 of 39 Reviews for Reading and Comprehension of Text in English
By PARADA O N
•Oct 8, 2024
GOOD
By 24PCT11 M K
•Aug 13, 2025
I loved everything about coursera except the fact that there are plenty of spelling mistakes in the text areas so kindly rectify this, thank you !
By Jeisson A L G
•Apr 3, 2025
se encuentran fallos en calificaciones y eso afecta la experiencia
By Janhavi B
•Jul 15, 2025
too many grammatical and spelling errors
By Joanna E P O
•Nov 22, 2024
Hay algunos PDF que se repiten
By ERIKA T Z G
•Nov 22, 2024
BUENO
By Jeevan J
•Mar 29, 2026
Good
By Jane S A
•Aug 11, 2025
Overall course is pretty good but there are a lot of mistakes in the comprehension passages, the right answers acquired from the passage are deemed wrong after the submission of the test hence I would prefer that to be looked into and corrected but otherwise it was alright.
By HUEPA P E
•Dec 10, 2024
Me fuese gustado mas información en los PDF, también, en los videos mas interacción, dentro del video imágenes y no solo lectura. por ultimo, hubo una que otra tarea donde eran confusas sus respuestas y preguntas.
By Laura Q D
•Mar 9, 2025
varias tareas no aceptan las respuestas correctas y califican mal
By Martínez
•May 31, 2025
Unless it is on purpose for us to easily find them, this course is full of typos. The readings and the quizzes have a lot of typos liket his where the words are joi nttogher or are se parat ed. Furthermore, the background music in some of the videos is too loud that the lecturer can be barely heard.
By SANCHEZ P C G
•Oct 28, 2024
This course should improve its explication, it should be explained by qualified teachers and gives more examples on new topics. Also, it would be great if it gave more attempts on the quizzes, because everyone isn't good at English.
By GISELA M R F
•Apr 3, 2026
The content was very poor; some texts were incoherent or simply didn't correspond to what they were evaluating (e.g., they asked about paragraph 5, but the text had 3 paragraphs). In the videos, the speaker's audio was lost in the background music, and since it was an English course, better pronunciation would be beneficial.